Romania – Maria’s story

Maria is one of the many elderlies who has lived her whole life in the rural commune P, situated in the mountainous area of Vrancea county. While P does not benefit from a general practitioner (GP), Maria has registered with one of the two GPs who take care of several localities in the area. Maria admits that the communication with her GP is very good, but she fears that the 2 days her GP is in present in the commune each week are not merely enough. A lot of people require medical attention in her locality, especially those like her with increased needs, given the age. There were times when Maria had to travel to another locality to see her GP. So, she is not so unhappy today.

Access to specialised medical care is even more difficult for Maria. To get to a specialised doctor, she has to ask family members or neighbours who have a car to drive her. If nobody is available, she takes a minibus at 7:30 in the morning, that only returns late in the afternoon, which is tiring for her.

Maria has diabetes and requires regular injectable treatment, but in the area, there is no medical facility where such routine procedures can be done. She found out that her neighbour, Ana, has performed such injectable treatment before for other neighbours and they did not had complications, so now she relies on Ana to do this procedure.

Given her medical condition, it is crucial for Maria to perform medical tests periodically. While a private mobile laboratory comes at the end of each month to run medical tests for the locals, it is difficult for her to set aside money to pay for them and so she cannot always afford them, putting her wellness at risk.

Maria feels very lucky to have a pharmacy in her commune, despite it being open only a few hours a day. She says that her friends in the nearby village are much worse off, as they do not even have access to a pharmacy, and their children who work in P leave with “bags of medicine” for them and other neighbours.

However, Maria feels she lacks dental services in the village, for which she has to travel to another commune to access. And even so, the dental office is very busy and waiting times for making an appointment could reach months, which is why she has neglected her dental care and now faces serious problems. She only hopes her grandson, who goes to school and already has problems with cavities, would be lucky enough to see a dentist more often, yet the chances are slim.

Maria realises that her access to medical services is limited, but she has adapted to the situation and has accepted the current state as it is. She is thankful for the little access that she enjoys and sympathizes with the ones that do not have these services.

The Netherlands – Rose’s story

Rose is a 29-year old young lady with a chronic condition, living in the northern part of North-Holland, The Netherlands. The area where she lives has been suffering from GP shortages for some time already, and some of the GP practices in the area are now being covered by a commercial GP service provider. Several such commercial operators are active in The Netherlands, with promises of a more business-like, efficient and effective service delivery. But these operators, too, have difficulty filling the duty rosters. In one instance, they had to resort to a substitute doctor who was only present two days a week.

Rose’s condition requires her to regularly update and renew her prescription medication; without it, she risks additional problems such as heart failure. Last autumn, she couldn’t get it. “The GP assistant simply told me that no GP was available to renew my prescription and that she didn’t know when one would be available again.”

She also needs to undergo regular monitoring and lab tests, which are normally performed by her GP as well, but could not be done now, either. She eventually managed to convince one of her other treating doctors to do those tests for her.

Rose: “I tried to switch doctors and register with one of the other general practices in this region. But none of them is taking new patients. When I only had medication left for one day, I pleaded with the assistant to renew the prescription for me, which she did. It’s actually not allowed, and I would hate to get her into trouble, but I was at my wit’s end. At least she helped me!”

In order to raise awareness, not only about her own plight, but about the GP situation in her area in general, Rose filed a complaint with the National Health Inspectorate, but received only a formal acknowledgment of receipt. She approached the regional health insurance company, spoke with the director of the commercial provider and discussed the situation with the local alderman – all to no avail. Everyone is aware of the problems, yet no one seems to be able to make solutions happen. They all point to each other for the ‘magic bullet’ intervention.

And Rose? “I have a new GP now, and feel lucky to have found one. But having a GP who is familiar with you and your condition should not depend on ‘luck’ in a rich country like The Netherlands. And I know there are many more people who still need to shop around to see a GP.”

Serbia – Aleksandar’s story

Barriers to accessing needed health services 

Aleksandar has been retired for several years and continues to live in a medium-sized town in M. Serbian County. He is highly educated, has worked in public service all his life, is the proud father of two children and grandfather of 4 grandchildren. Although he suffers from several chronic illnesses, including myasthenia gravis and hypertension, he does not see himself as needing much medical attention, as he does indeed take a lot of care of his health. 

He was registered with a local general practitioner (GP) in the public primary health care centre (PHC), and there is a public general hospital nearby. He is often confused why it is impossible for him to do even basic examinations, specialist consultations and laboratory analyses in his local public PHC. The GP at the local public PHC explained to him that by law the public PHC cannot host the specialists he needs, and the laboratory unit at PHC is closed because there is a laboratory department in the nearby general hospital. 

For Aleksandar, this means that in case of need for medical specialists and/or laboratory services, he must first make an appointment with his GP in the public PHC, who will then refer him to the nearby public general hospital. In a general hospital, he should first make an appointment with the available medical specialists, who will then perform a clinical examination(s) and order the necessary diagnostics and laboratory tests. So, the next step for Alexander is to arrange the necessary diagnostics and laboratory tests at a public general hospital. In case there is a long waiting list for diagnostics, or the laboratory in the public general hospital cannot do all the tests, it is necessary to go to a place that can provide all the necessary services including diagnostic/laboratory tests and treatment. That place can be a public hospital that is geographically and temporally further away from his home or a private practice. At this moment, Aleksandar must decide whether, based on his financial and time capabilities, he will make an appointment for services in public or private practice. When the diagnostics and laboratory results are finished, Aleksandar should visit a specialist doctor again to get an interpretation of the laboratory results and treatment recommendations. At that control visit (which also needs to be scheduled), specialist doctors give a diagnosis and a recommendation for (hospital or outpatient) therapy. In both cases, the mandatory health insurance cover therapy which is only prescribed by his GP in public PHC. This means that Aleksandar needs to schedule a visit to the GP at his public PHC again, in order to get a prescription for the therapy ordered by the specialist doctor. In order to avoid such a large number of referrals and depending on the urgency of his needs, Aleksandar, like many other patients, opts for the services of a private practice instead of those available in public facility, or postpones seeking medical services as long as possible. Although he has been paying mandatory health insurance for over 45 years to protect him from catastrophic health-related expenses, he often uses services in private practice, including pharmacies, which increases his out-of-pocket health expenses.  

The last time he had a high blood pressure crisis, he requested health care, which denied him a home visit and the possibility of transportation to emergency unit. His son arranged for him to be examined by different doctors in the capital – Belgrade. Aleksandar believes that this would not have been possible if his son had not had good contacts with the doctors there. Fortunately, Aleksandar was able to receive appropriate treatment, but he is concerned about his health and that of his fellow citizens who may not be so lucky.  

Recently, Alexander thought he had suffered nerve damage when he moved suddenly in his house. In excruciating pain and unable to move, he called an ambulance, but was told they didn’t have a car available. Surprised by the unresponsiveness of the public health system and the poor availability of timely diagnosis and treatment, he had to once again call for help from his son who lives far away, although he would not like his son to think that he is incapable for self-managing the diseases. However, his son was afraid that it might not be nerve damage, but something more serious like a myasthenia gravis crisis, so he tried to contact the emergency room at the hospital and explain the situation. He couldn’t believe that he was told to bring his father to the Emergency Center “when he felt better” or to refer the GP for home care, as they had no way of helping his father at that moment. 

Since there was no public health service or health worker available to help him, the son arranged for a private doctor and nurse to come and do the necessary laboratory tests and provide therapy. He managed all this while traveling 80 kilometres to get to his father’s house in time and cover his health care bills. In order to take care of his father’s illness, he stayed with his father as many days as needed, taking on unpaid leave from work. 

Alexander never felt like he was in a medical desert. Surrounded by buildings, his town has a primary healthcare facility, pharmacies and a public sector hospital, as well as private health practices. He learned from the media that Serbia still has a lot of unemployed health workers, in addition to open jobs throughout the country and permanent employment for work abroad. Nonetheless, he hopes that this his story is rare and that few people in Serbia suffer from similar inadequacies of the health care system. 

Although he has been paying obligatory healthcare insurance for his whole life, without the help of his son, there would not be solutions to his urgent problems in public health sector in his county. It is a pity that public sector does not organize mobile health care and digital services to overcome barriers to access to health care services such as complicated organization of service provision, unavailability of competent health workers and appropriate skill-mix in primary care and high-quality and timely treatment of illnesses in a difficult stadium. 

Romania

On this page, you can the following information about medical desertification in Romania: 

1) An illustrative story about an individual affected by medical desertification in Romania 

2) Our country report on medical deserts in Romania 

3) A selection of indicators for background information about Romania 

4) Our Medical Deserts Diagnostic Tool: maps based on the contextualised set of indicators 

 

Map 1: General Practitioners / 10000 inhabitants

This is a map of Romania showing the number of general practitioners (GP) per municipality, and per 10.000 inhabitants as a possible indicator of healthcare access.

For more information click on the MAP

Map 2: General Practitioners / adjusted 10000 inhabitants

This is a map of Romania showing the number of general practitioners (GP) per municipality, and per 10.000 adjusted inhabitants.

For more information click on the MAP!

Map 3: General Practitioners / adjusted 10000 inhabitants & considering neighboring localities

This is a map of Romania showing the number of general practitioners (GP) per municipality, and per 10.000 adjusted inhabitants and considering also the supply and demand in neighboring localities.

For more information click on the MAP!

Map 4: Pharmacies / 10000 inhabitants (unadjusted index)

Simple counts are used for number of pharmacies, respectively population size.

This is a map of Romania showing the number of pharmacies per municipality, and per 10.000 inhabitants.

For more information click on the MAP

Map 5: Pharmacies / 10000 adjusted inhabitants (adjusted population; locality only)

Simple counts are used for number of pharmacies. Population is adjusted according to its age structure.

This is a map of Romania showing the number of pharmacies per municipality, and per 10.000 adjusted inhabitants.

For more information click on the MAP

Map 6: Pharmacies / 10000 adjusted inhabitants & depending on neighboring localities

The index is taking into consideration only the unadjusted population of the locality and the number of pharmacies from that locality.

Localities are colour-coded from light blue (lowest numbers) to dark blue (highest numbers).

For more information click on the MAP

Map 7: Hospitals level 1-3 / 1 million adjusted inhabitants [30 km catchment area]

Population is adjusted according to its age structure. Both population and hospitals include information on neighboring localities.

This is a map of Romania showing the number of level 1-3 hospitals per municipality, and per 1 million adjusted inhabitants, and also considering the supply and demand within 30 km catchment area

For more information click on the MAP

Map 8: Hospitals level 1-5 / 1 million adjusted inhabitants [30 km catchment area]

Population is adjusted according to its age structure. Both population and hospitals include information on neighboring localities.

This is a map of Romania showing the number of level 1-5 hospitals per municipality, and per 1 million adjusted inhabitants, and also considering the supply and demand within 30 km catchment area

For more information click on the MAP

The Netherlands

On this page, you can the following information about medical desertification in the Netherlands: 

1) An illustrative story about an individual affected by medical desertification in the Netherlands 

2) Our country report on medical deserts in the Netherlands 

3) A selection of indicators for background information about the Netherlands 

4) Our Medical Deserts Diagnostic Tool: maps based on the contextualised set of indicators 

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the full-time equivalent of GPs per 100,000 population per municipality. Colour-coded from lightest blue (less than 30) to darkest blue (more than 65), for the years 2015-2018.

The municipalities are based on the 2018 municipal reorganisation. Comparing the years 2015-2018 gives an indication of the changes in GP coverage in the Netherlands.

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the full-time equivalent of GPs per 100,000 population per municipality. Colour-coded from lightest blue (less than 30) to darkest blue (more than 65), for the year 2015.

The municipalities are based on the 2018 municipal reorganisation. Comparing the years 2015-2018 gives an indication of the changes in GP coverage in the Netherlands.

 

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the full-time equivalent of GPs per 100,000 population per municipality. Colour-coded from lightest blue (less than 30) to darkest blue (more than 65), for the year 2017.

The municipalities are based on the 2018 municipal reorganisation. Comparing the years 2015-2018 gives an indication of the changes in GP coverage in the Netherlands.

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the full-time equivalent of GPs per 100,000 population per municipality. Colour-coded from lightest blue (less than 30) to darkest blue (more than 65), for the year 2016.

The municipalities are based on the 2018 municipal reorganisation. Comparing the years 2015-2018 gives an indication of the changes in GP coverage in the Netherlands.

 

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the full-time equivalent of GPs per 100,000 population per municipality. Colour-coded from lightest blue (less than 30) to darkest blue (more than 65), for the year 2018.

The municipalities are based on the 2018 municipal reorganisation. Comparing the years 2015-2018 gives an indication of the changes in GP coverage in the Netherlands.

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the number of general practitioners (GP) practice locations available within 5 km, per municipality, as a possible indicator of healthcare access, colour-coded from light blue (lowest numbers) to dark blue (highest numbers). A clear rural-urban gradient can be observed.

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the distance, in km, to the nearest general practitioners (GP) practice, per municipality, as a possible indicator of healthcare access, colour-coded from light blue (longest distance) to dark blue (shortest distance). A clear rural-urban gradient can be observed, but not as pronounced as in map 1.

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the number of GPs per 100,000 per municipality, adjusted for the population size and age groups. Different age groups require different levels of health care; this is accounted for in this map. Colour-coded from light blue (less GPs per 100,000 per municipality, adjusted for the population size and age groups) to dark blue (more GPs per 100,000 per municipality, adjusted for the population size and age groups).

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the number of GPs per 100,000 (per municipality), adjusted for the population size and age groups, and taking into consideration a service area (catchment area) with a radius of 20 km. Different age groups require different levels of health care; this is accounted for in this map. Moreover, a 10 km distance to a GP practice could be considered an acceptable distance, which means that people living within that area can choose which GP to visit. Colour-coded from light blue (less GPs per 100,000 per municipality, adjusted for the population size and age groups, within 20km) to dark blue (more GPs per 100,000 per municipality, adjusted for the population size and age groups, within 20 km).

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the number of hospitals (including outpatient clinics) within a distance of 20 km. Colour-coded from light blue (less than 3) to dark blue (more than 24).

This is a map of the Netherlands showing the distance to the nearest hospital (including outpatient clinics). Colour-coded from light blue (more than 30 km) to dark blue (less than 2,5 km)

Number of hospitals, adjusted for population age groups, in a catchment area of 20km.

Verified by MonsterInsights